<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Answers</title>
	<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135</link>
	<description>Ian Lance Taylor</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Internet Answers by: martindorey</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-14305</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-14305</guid>
					<description>I've been calling this &quot;Morton's Gambit&quot; after Andrew Morton's description of his technique of suggesting a deliberately botched fix in an interview that I think would be at http://kerneltrap.org/node/10 if that server were responding.  I can't but imagine that the prior art goes back further.  Is it just an internet phenomenon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve been calling this &#8220;Morton&#8217;s Gambit&#8221; after Andrew Morton&#8217;s description of his technique of suggesting a deliberately botched fix in an interview that I think would be at <a href='http://kerneltrap.org/node/10' rel='nofollow'>http://kerneltrap.org/node/10</a> if that server were responding.  I can&#8217;t but imagine that the prior art goes back further.  Is it just an internet phenomenon?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Internet Answers by: Ian Lance Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9815</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9815</guid>
					<description>Ah, a well-known technique, I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, a well-known technique, I see.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Internet Answers by: fche</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9802</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9802</guid>
					<description>Boss Lady (if you remember her) had long practiced this approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Boss Lady (if you remember her) had long practiced this approach.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Internet Answers by: tromey</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9800</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9800</guid>
					<description>I wonder if this post is a question phrased as an answer.  Nice try!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wonder if this post is a question phrased as an answer.  Nice try!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Internet Answers by: ianw</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9795</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/135#comment-9795</guid>
					<description>I have long been a proponent of this approach since I heard Alan Cox say at a linux.conf.au &quot;the quickest way to get anything fixed in the kernel is to send an obviously incorrect patch.  People can't resist telling you what's wrong&quot;.  I've been sending obviously incorrect patches all over the place since!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have long been a proponent of this approach since I heard Alan Cox say at a linux.conf.au &#8220;the quickest way to get anything fixed in the kernel is to send an obviously incorrect patch.  People can&#8217;t resist telling you what&#8217;s wrong&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve been sending obviously incorrect patches all over the place since!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
