<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Does the Gcc Organization Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155</link>
	<description>Ian Lance Taylor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pinskia</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155/comment-page-1#comment-11719</link>
		<dc:creator>pinskia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155#comment-11719</guid>
		<description>I would say GCC actually has way more contributers than many closed source projects that are of GCC&#039;s size.  If we just look at certain sections of GCC; like the C++ fe, there are about 4-5 contributers, this sounds about the size of the EDG (their website in fact says 5 people).   This is not to mention the C front-end side of things which brings in about 2 more folks.  So saying large number of active contributors is correct.

-- Pinski</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say GCC actually has way more contributers than many closed source projects that are of GCC&#8217;s size.  If we just look at certain sections of GCC; like the C++ fe, there are about 4-5 contributers, this sounds about the size of the EDG (their website in fact says 5 people).   This is not to mention the C front-end side of things which brings in about 2 more folks.  So saying large number of active contributors is correct.</p>
<p>&#8211; Pinski</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lance Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155/comment-page-1#comment-11324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Lance Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155#comment-11324</guid>
		<description>That was ten years ago.  There are rather more contributors today.  I just checked the ChangeLog since the start of the year, just for the compiler proper (i.e., not the libraries or the testsuite or the non-C frontends), and there were 92 different contributors.

More importantly, as free software projects go, even 27 active contributors is a lot.  Sure, there are projects with more.  But the vast majority of projects have far fewer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was ten years ago.  There are rather more contributors today.  I just checked the ChangeLog since the start of the year, just for the compiler proper (i.e., not the libraries or the testsuite or the non-C frontends), and there were 92 different contributors.</p>
<p>More importantly, as free software projects go, even 27 active contributors is a lot.  Sure, there are projects with more.  But the vast majority of projects have far fewer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexr</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155/comment-page-1#comment-11323</link>
		<dc:creator>alexr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/155#comment-11323</guid>
		<description>Last I checked, &quot;large number of active contributors&quot; wasn&#039;t really that large. At the time I counted (1998 or 1999) it was only like 27 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I checked, &#8220;large number of active contributors&#8221; wasn&#8217;t really that large. At the time I counted (1998 or 1999) it was only like 27 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
