<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abolish Syntax</title>
	<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235</link>
	<description>Ian Lance Taylor</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 01:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Abolish Syntax by: yuri</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14745</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14745</guid>
					<description>I think,  more relaxed syntax language has, more context dependent parsing should be done. Syntax is for simplification of statements recognition or for making statements recognition possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think,  more relaxed syntax language has, more context dependent parsing should be done. Syntax is for simplification of statements recognition or for making statements recognition possible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Abolish Syntax by: Ian Lance Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14733</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14733</guid>
					<description>Sure, there is a syntax in the minimalist sense.  Without that, it would just be random.  The minimalism can be seen in that if two strings are different in any character, they have different meanings.  And while it's possible to write a string which doesn't mean anything, it's not possible to write a string which is syntactically invalid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sure, there is a syntax in the minimalist sense.  Without that, it would just be random.  The minimalism can be seen in that if two strings are different in any character, they have different meanings.  And while it&#8217;s possible to write a string which doesn&#8217;t mean anything, it&#8217;s not possible to write a string which is syntactically invalid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Abolish Syntax by: kevingessner</title>
		<link>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14729</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 20:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.airs.com/blog/archives/235#comment-14729</guid>
					<description>&quot;There are no keywords or grouping constructs. Each statement is a single line. The first character on the line indicates the type of statement.&quot;

But then isn't each line the &quot;grouping construct&quot;, and the first character a &quot;keyword&quot;?  It's a simple syntax, but a syntax nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;There are no keywords or grouping constructs. Each statement is a single line. The first character on the line indicates the type of statement.&#8221;</p>
	<p>But then isn&#8217;t each line the &#8220;grouping construct&#8221;, and the first character a &#8220;keyword&#8221;?  It&#8217;s a simple syntax, but a syntax nonetheless.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
