{"id":374,"date":"2010-06-05T11:21:10","date_gmt":"2010-06-05T18:21:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/?p=374"},"modified":"2010-06-05T11:21:10","modified_gmt":"2010-06-05T18:21:10","slug":"proposition-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/archives\/374","title":{"rendered":"Proposition 16"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>California&#8217;s proposition 16, which will be voted on next Tuesday, is an interesting use of California&#8217;s bizarre ballot initiative process.  The proposition says that if a local government wants to start a municipal electrical utility, it must get a 2\/3 majority of votes.  The proposition was initiated and almost entirely funded by PG&#038;E, a California electric company, which has reportedly spent over $35 million on advertising in support of the proposition.  I rarely watch television, but I&#8217;ve received quite a few flyers in the mail about it.  Some even list a long set of candidates and positions to endorse, along with proposition 16.  However, since these flyers are required to list the groups which explicitly endorsed the flyer, it&#8217;s easy to see that the flyers are being put out for proposition 16, and they are trying to slide in support for it along with other candidates I might be inclined to vote for anyhow.<\/p>\n<p>PG&#038;E is the only company from which I can buy my electricity.  Electricity distribution is a classic natural monopoly; why would two different companies put up wires to everybody&#8217;s house?  Since modern life requires electricity, and since I can only get it from PG&#038;E, I am a PG&#038;E customer.  Proposition 16 appears to be designed solely to preserve PG&#038;E&#8217;s monopoly position, by making it much harder for communities to create their own municipal power companies.  It would be hard enough to get a majority vote in favor of government run power; I think we can assume that a 2\/3 majority would be effectively impossible.  It&#8217;s pretty darn annoying that PG&#038;E is spending $35 million, including money they collect from me, on this.  Is that a good use of my money?<\/p>\n<p>Municipal power is not impossible.  For example, Palo Alto, California, uses a municipal power utility.  It was notable during the rolling blackouts that affected most of California in the early 2000s that Palo Alto was immune.  So it&#8217;s not as though PG&#038;E deserves to be protected because they are doing a particularly good job.  When a real crunch time came, they did a very poor job indeed.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s difficult for me to imagine why anybody would vote in favor of such a blatant power grab by a private company.  But then, of course, there&#8217;s the $35 million.  The opponents of proposition 16 have reportedly raised less than $100,000.  I assume that if PG&#038;E succeeds we will see more and more cases where private companies spend lots of money on ballot initiatives in their favor.  I hope that it fails, and if I have any readers in California I encourage you to vote against proposition 16 this Tuesday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>California&#8217;s proposition 16, which will be voted on next Tuesday, is an interesting use of California&#8217;s bizarre ballot initiative process. The proposition says that if a local government wants to start a municipal electrical utility, it must get a 2\/3 majority of votes. The proposition was initiated and almost entirely funded by PG&#038;E, a California [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=374"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":375,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/374\/revisions\/375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.airs.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}